Alice is scolded by fantastical
characters for her ‘ignorance.’ “You ought to be ashamed of yourself for asking
such a simple question,” retorts the Gryphon to a reasonable query. When Alice
claims never to have seen a grinning cat, the Duchess replies, “You don’t know
much … and that’s a fact.” Other examples abound. While these may seem
unnecessarily cruel interactions, they are evocative of the frustration felt by
children when their opinions are given short shrift simply because they are
young.
Alice’s interactions often end abruptly:
the Caterpillar and Cheshire Cat vanish into thin air while the Red Queen
wanders in and out of Alice’s sight. The constant appearance and disappearance
of characters evokes the confusing ways in which adults wander in and out of a
child’s life: houseguests leave just as suddenly as they appear, and a step-parent’s
presence is completely upended by a separation, for example.
But nothing communicates the befuddling
tyranny of adults more than the capricious punishments doled out by the Queen
of Hearts. She bosses people around with extreme severity (‘“Get to your
places!” shouted the Queen in a voice of thunder,’) and orders executions
willy-nilly. Her behavior arouses the exaggerated sense of injustice
experienced by children when they get punished. She represents something more
terrifying than a strict parent, and which Victorian England produced in
abundance: a dictatorial schoolmistress.
The Alice books present the chasm
separating adult logic from that of children. While Lewis Carroll left a thin
biographical trail, his known love of children suggests he delighted in
exposing the world of adults as one of utter nonsense!

Ohh, this is fascinating. I wish I'd read it before I started on my essay.
ReplyDeleteI think that Alice could be read as a sort of 'It Gets Better' for the Victorian child. And I think that's where the subversion lies in this text.
Oh God you're right! What a hilarious image you've left me with.
ReplyDeleteThe same sentiment can be applied to the educational setup that Alice has to endure in Victorian England, no?
What a lovely blog you have! Came here from Coursera. I like this interpretation of Alice. I feel the same as Clare - I wish I had read this before I started my essay!
ReplyDeleteThanks! This is my first experience of blogging so I am having lots of fun with it.
ReplyDeleteThat is a great name, congenitallydisturbed. Aren't we all, after all?!
Hi, I found your blog on coursera (I'm the guy who posted the Frankenstein article, and asked about Halberstam). I liked your analysis! The queen, for me, seems to be something more icky than a school mistress. I think that the queen is basically the ultimate absurdity that Alice has to distance herself from: a hot tempered, yet socially powerful lady. All the wrong kinds of femininity, or something :p
ReplyDeleteAnyways, I'm mainly reaching out to say hi.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteHey Sam
ReplyDeleteWhat a great surprise! I am thrilled to find you here, as I've enjoyed our exchange over in the discussion forums. The Frankenstein and transsexuality essay you pointed to is earmarked for me on my Readability list. I waiting to finish Dracula to dig into it with gusto.
I like how you've opened up interpretation of the Queen of Hearts to encompass a wider scope of female archetype. This has allowed me to think of the friction between Alice and the Queen as evoking the tension between budding (Alice) and womanhood under threat of usurpation (the Queen)
Welcome to my blog! I'm looking forward to exchanging lots of great ideas with you.
I agree with your analysis, and I love the way you posed it. Have you read Halberstam's Female Masculinities? Because this reminds me of her, a bit.
ReplyDeletebtw, I followed your blog by going to my profile and clicking 'add' under the Reading List.
No I haven't! I remember looking for it, but they didn't have it in my local library (I was, and still am, located outside the US).
ReplyDeleteFinally managed to follow you. I couldn't find the add button, which is why I was confused, but I discovered a way around it.
I have zero knowledge of cyborgs, so this will be an exciting learning curve for me!
I actually never looked at Alice the same way again. It is totally different now when you actually read it from the philosophical perspective. The Queen of Hearts is an ironic representation of the justice system.
ReplyDeleteP.S. I love it how blogs become extensions of our Coursera classes.
I love it too. It makes the interactions more human, somehow. I hope in the future Coursera will allow students to upload profile pictures or the like.
ReplyDeleteI think your description of the Queen of Hearts as an ironic representation of the justice system is very apt – especially considering that crazy trial!
Alice belittles the Queen and shuts off all further contact with this line –
"Who cares for you?" said Alice (she had grown to her full size by this time). "You're nothing but a pack of cards!"
I looked up the origin of the expression 'house of cards' to mean built on a flimsy foundation, and it turns out that the expression has been in use since the seventeenth century! So Carroll was probably trying to convey what you just said!
I'm off to watch the video lectures now.